CVE-2025-39691

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

fs/buffer: fix use-after-free when call bh_read() helper

There's issue as follows:
BUG: KASAN: stack-out-of-bounds in end_buffer_read_sync+0xe3/0x110
Read of size 8 at addr ffffc9000168f7f8 by task swapper/3/0
CPU: 3 UID: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/3 Not tainted 6.16.0-862.14.0.6.x86_64
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)
Call Trace:
 <IRQ>
 dump_stack_lvl+0x55/0x70
 print_address_description.constprop.0+0x2c/0x390
 print_report+0xb4/0x270
 kasan_report+0xb8/0xf0
 end_buffer_read_sync+0xe3/0x110
 end_bio_bh_io_sync+0x56/0x80
 blk_update_request+0x30a/0x720
 scsi_end_request+0x51/0x2b0
 scsi_io_completion+0xe3/0x480
 ? scsi_device_unbusy+0x11e/0x160
 blk_complete_reqs+0x7b/0x90
 handle_softirqs+0xef/0x370
 irq_exit_rcu+0xa5/0xd0
 sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x6e/0x90
 </IRQ>

 Above issue happens when do ntfs3 filesystem mount, issue may happens
 as follows:
           mount                            IRQ
ntfs_fill_super
  read_cache_page
    do_read_cache_folio
      filemap_read_folio
        mpage_read_folio
	 do_mpage_readpage
	  ntfs_get_block_vbo
	   bh_read
	     submit_bh
	     wait_on_buffer(bh);
	                            blk_complete_reqs
				     scsi_io_completion
				      scsi_end_request
				       blk_update_request
				        end_bio_bh_io_sync
					 end_buffer_read_sync
					  __end_buffer_read_notouch
					   unlock_buffer

            wait_on_buffer(bh);--> return will return to caller

					  put_bh
					    --> trigger stack-out-of-bounds
In the mpage_read_folio() function, the stack variable 'map_bh' is
passed to ntfs_get_block_vbo(). Once unlock_buffer() unlocks and
wait_on_buffer() returns to continue processing, the stack variable
is likely to be reclaimed. Consequently, during the end_buffer_read_sync()
process, calling put_bh() may result in stack overrun.

If the bh is not allocated on the stack, it belongs to a folio.  Freeing
a buffer head which belongs to a folio is done by drop_buffers() which
will fail to free buffers which are still locked.  So it is safe to call
put_bh() before __end_buffer_read_notouch().